7. 2. 2019 v 18:12, ANTIGNAC Thibaud &lt;Thibaud.ANTIGNAC(a)cea.fr&gt;fr>: Hello Jan, Thank you for your feedback. Indeed, Ambition, Objectives and goals, and Impact expected have similarities. We consider they are three facets of the three main questions: how are we going to change the game? With this in mind, the Ambition describe the advance which will be made in general on the matter delimited by the activity while the Expected impact will be more about the big changes this will make in the society at large. Finally, the Goals and objectives will be more operational description of what has to be performed to reach the Ambition (which in turn will help enabling the Expected impact). For example, to take the field of privacy, this would give something along the following lines: Ambition: put the citizens in control of their personal data Goals and objectives: develop a data tracking technology, develop a data recall technology, develop an enforcement framework Expected impact: rebalance the asymmetry between the citizens and the GAFAs, profoundly change economically viable personal data intensive business models Concerning the background policy, this is about the regulatory context or institutional dynamics at play which can impact the activities. In data protection, we can of course mention the GDPR, the ePrivacy Directive and the current project to have an ePrivacy Regulation, guides and good practices given by Data Supervisory Authorities, … Does it make sense to you? Best regards, -- Thibaud Antignac CEA List From: Jan Hajny &lt;hajny(a)feec.vutbr.cz&gt; Date: Thursday 7 February 2019 at 14:20 To: ANTIGNAC Thibaud &lt;Thibaud.ANTIGNAC(a)cea.fr&gt; Cc: &quot;network.leads(a)internal.sparta.eu&quot; &lt;network.leads(a)internal.sparta.eu&gt; Subject: Re: [SPARTA network.leads] SPARTA Network K-O slides Dear All, some fast feedback: - having all Ambition, Goals&Objectives and Impact Expected topics as separate slides seems a bit redundant to me, - what do we mean by Policy Background? In particular w.r.t. the WP9 Training and Awareness this is not clear to me, - 21 slides for 20 minutes seems a bit too much, - 11/2 is ok for the first draft, but I doubt I’ll be able to get the feedback from WP members on time. Best :-) Jan —— doc. Ing. Jan Hajný, Ph.D. Advanced Cybersecurity Brno University of Technology Phone: +420 541 146 961 WWW: http://crypto.utko.feec.vutbr.cz <http://crypto.utko.feec.vutbr.cz/> 7. 2. 2019 v 11:59, ANTIGNAC Thibaud &lt;Thibaud.ANTIGNAC(a)cea.fr <mailto:Thibaud.ANTIGNAC@cea.fr>>: Dear Network leaders, As SPARTA starts up, our first order of business is to refine the activities workplans. We propose using the slides for the SPARTA Kick-off as a first point of convergence. Attached is a proposed plan for these presentations. As you can notice, we kept the notions of State of the Art and Ambition generally used for the technical activities. We thought it could be interesting to explore how we can have the same approach in non-technical activities as well, aiming at making good practices progress as well. Feedback is very welcome! Given the short timeframe, could you share your initial versions of slides by 11/2? (We are trying to have a Powerpoint template ready very soon; do not yet spend too much time on formatting!) Best regards, -- Thibaud, Florent, and Géraud SPARTA coordination team CEA List <SPARTA Network presentation for Kickoff v1.xlsx>-- network.leads mailing list network.leads(a)server.sparta.eu <mailto:network.leads@server.sparta.eu> http://server.sparta.eu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/network.leads <http://server.sparta.eu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/network.leads>