Hello Jan,
Thank you for your feedback. Indeed, Ambition, Objectives and goals, and Impact expected have similarities. We consider they are three facets of the three main questions: how are we going to change the game? With this in mind, the Ambition describe the advance which will be made in general on the matter delimited by the activity while the Expected impact will be more about the big changes this will make in the society at large. Finally, the Goals and objectives will be more operational description of what has to be performed to reach the Ambition (which in turn will help enabling the Expected impact).
For example, to take the field of privacy, this would give something along the following lines:
Concerning the background policy, this is about the regulatory context or institutional dynamics at play which can impact the activities. In data protection, we can of course mention the GDPR, the ePrivacy Directive and the current project to have an ePrivacy Regulation, guides and good practices given by Data Supervisory Authorities, …
Does it make sense to you?
Best regards,
--
Thibaud Antignac
CEA List
From: Jan Hajny <hajny@feec.vutbr.cz>
Date: Thursday 7 February 2019 at 14:20
To: ANTIGNAC Thibaud <Thibaud.ANTIGNAC@cea.fr>
Cc: "network.leads@internal.sparta.eu" <network.leads@internal.sparta.eu>
Subject: Re: [SPARTA network.leads] SPARTA Network K-O slides
Dear All,
some fast feedback:
- having all Ambition, Goals&Objectives and Impact Expected topics as separate slides seems a bit redundant to me,
- what do we mean by Policy Background? In particular w.r.t. the WP9 Training and Awareness this is not clear to me,
- 21 slides for 20 minutes seems a bit too much,
- 11/2 is ok for the first draft, but I doubt I’ll be able to get the feedback from WP members on time.
Best :-)
Jan
——
doc. Ing. Jan Hajný, Ph.D.
Advanced Cybersecurity
Brno University of Technology
Phone: +420 541 146 961
WWW: http://crypto.utko.feec.vutbr.cz