[SPARTA - network.certification] Fwd: Re: [SPARTA - bodies.executive-board] Slides for the review
11 Feb
2020
11 Feb
'20
2:06 p.m.
Dear partners,
Please find attached the review presentation template. I suggest to
review the template during tomorrow's call at 11:00 CET so that task
leaders can provide the contents for their activities.
For the agenda, I suggest:
- review of the review presentation template with respect to WP11 tasks.
- access to standards mentionned in D11.1
- CyberCert workshop status
Best regards,
Philippe
-------- Message transféré --------
Sujet : Re: [SPARTA - bodies.executive-board] Slides for the review
Date : Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:36:33 +0000
De : LEMESLE Augustin <augustin.lemesle(a)cea.fr>
Pour : bodies.executive-board(a)internal.sparta.eu
<bodies.executive-board(a)internal.sparta.eu>
Dear WP leaders,
Please find attached the new template for the review. Only minor modification were made, I
removed KPIs and added the missing Roadmap slides.
It can be found on the SVN and also on Stackfield. I hope we can have some preliminary
slides by 14th February and final version by 21th.
Best regards,
Augustin.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : bodies.executive-board <bodies.executive-board-bounces(a)server.sparta.eu> De la
part de LEMESLE Augustin
Envoyé : mercredi 5 février 2020 09:34
À : bodies.executive-board(a)internal.sparta.eu
Objet : [PROVENANCE INTERNET] Re: [SPARTA - bodies.executive-board] Slides for the review
Dear all,
To answer some of your concerns and for clarification, we thought of the 1 person per
organisation as the PO told us the room would be a 40 person room. Since indeed it might
limit interactions and Q&A, we will try to see with the PO for bigger premises or some
alternative solution as Michael or Hervé mentioned. For that, we would need a list of all
people attending the review, I would suggest to try and compile it at WP level, and we
would discuss with the PO with this list.
On achievements slides, I did not want to fill the template with empty achievement slides
but I expect more than one slide for achievement. What I was thinking of was a quick look
at project management on which they will already have other material but still seems good
to mention and more lengthy focus on achievements (indeed with one slide it was not
obvious). I am open to suggestion on this and on the content we could put in
"Achievements" slides. What would you see in this?
On other points:
- @Michael: on the agenda, first session WP1 and WP2 (+ WP14) may be joint and we need to
discuss this but other session will stay per WP only.
- @Jan: I'd say just not to focus on the summary orally
- My bad for the Roadmap slide will be added in the final version, I'm open to
suggestion on possible content also.
- Demonstration is indeed only for programs.
Best regards,
Augustin.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Herve Debar <herve.debar(a)telecom-sudparis.eu> Envoyé : mardi 4 février 2020
14:49 À : LEMESLE Augustin <augustin.lemesle(a)cea.fr> Cc :
bodies.executive-board(a)internal.sparta.eu
Objet : Re: [SPARTA - bodies.executive-board] Slides for the review
Dear Augustin,
I agree with many of Michael's points.
The slides seem very mechanical. On one hand, they do not easily reflect the actual
scientific production for a program. On the other hand, they seem to provide a rather
abstract projection of the governance activity, which is more "project
management", but not really governance per se.
I also share the worry about content. I am wondering about attendance of at least task
leaders for CAPE. It seems to me that the best would be to limit the number of people *in
the room* per period, e.g. for CAPE have only the 13 partners participating in the review,
and the others wait in an adjacent room. It will create some in/out confusion in the room,
but might allow for more interaction with the reviewers if needed. At the same time I can
understand doubts about the actual feasibility of my proposal.
Best regards,
Hervé
Le 04/02/2020 à 13:39, Friedewald, Michael a écrit :
Dear Agustin,
according to the last agenda that was discussed there will be joint presentations of more
than one WP (WP 1, 2, 14 / WP 8, 9 / WP 10, 11, 12). Your slides do not seem to fit for
that purpose.
Apart from that the presentation seem to be quite formalistic: Lots of
slides on KPI, submitted deliverables, formal risks, etc. – but only
one slide on “Achievements”. Could you please elaborate how many
slides you expect in total and where the focus should be. In my
experience reviewers are more interested in content …
Could you also elaborate a little bit about the limitation of participants in the review
meeting. I do understand that space is limited for such a big consortium like SPARTA.
However, if we are going to discuss CONTENT with the reviewers it might be necessary to
have at least some people available. For instance: Since I am not a legal scholar I can
maybe give an overview of the results but when it comes to Q&A I would be rather soon
at my limits and would probably give the word to the experts. Otherwise the impression
that we give might be a bit strange. Having them stand-by outside the room and asking them
inside for the relevant work packages might not be very convenient but a possibility.
Best
Michael
---
Dr. Michael Friedewald
Coordinator ICT Research
Competence Center Emerging Technologies Fraunhofer-Institut für
System- und Innovationsforschung ISI Breslauer Straße 48 | 76139
Karlsruhe
fon: +49 721 6809-146 (-189, ass.) | fax: +49 721 6809-77-146
mailto:
michael.friedewald@isi.fraunhofer.de<mailto:michael.friedewald@isi.fra
unhofer.de>
https://www.isi.fraunhofer.de
https://www.forum-privatheit.de
https://www.dsfa.eu
https://works.bepress.com/michael_friedewald/
Neue Veröffentlichungen:
Ochs, C.; Friedewald, M.; Hess, T.; Lamla, J. (Hrsg.): Die Zukunft der
Datenökonomie. Digitales Leben zwischen Geschäftsmodell, Kollektivgut
und Verbraucherschutz. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 2019 (Medienkulturen
im digitalen Zeitalter).
https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783658275105
Friedewald, M. (Hrsg.): Privatheit und selbstbestimmtes Leben in der
Digitalen Welt: Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven auf aktuelle
Herausforderungen des Datenschutzes. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg. 2018
https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783658213831
M. Friedewald et al. (eds.): Privacy, Security and Surveillance:
Citizens’ Perspectives. London/New York: Routledge. 2017 (Open Access)
https://www.routledge.com/Surveillance-Privacy-and-Security-Citizens-P
erspectives/Friedewald-Burgess-Cas-Bellanova-Peissl/p/book/97811386492
48
Am 03.02.20, 16:06 schrieb "bodies.executive-board im Auftrag von LEMESLE
Augustin"
<bodies.executive-board-bounces@server.sparta.eu<mailto:bodies.executive-board-bounces@server.sparta.eu>
im Auftrag von augustin.lemesle@cea.fr<mailto:augustin.lemesle@cea.fr>>:
Dear WP leaders,
For the review, on 28th you can find attached a proposition for templates for the WP
presentation. As a quick timeline before the review:
· Feedback w.r.t. proposed templates until 7/02
· Preliminary version of the slides sent to coordination until 14/02
· Final slide version until 21/02
For reminder, we expect 1 person per organisation maximum at the review.
Best regards,
Augustin.
--
Hervé Debar <mailto:herve.debar@telecom-sudparis.eu>
Télécom SudParis http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~debar_he/
Département Réseaux et Services de Télécommunications (RST)
Tel: +33 (0)1 60 76 45 83 GSM: +33 (0)6 71 92 52 52
PGP: 539B427D Fax: +33 (0)1 60 76 42 91
--
bodies.executive-board mailing list
bodies.executive-board(a)server.sparta.eu
http://server.sparta.eu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bodies.executive-board
--
BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
------------------------------------------------------
Teach Belnet Antispam Pro if this mail (ID 0421pACOO) is spam:
Spam:
https://antispam.belnet.be/canit/b.php?c=s&i=0421pACOO&m=32f0ecbd84…
Not spam:
https://antispam.belnet.be/canit/b.php?c=n&i=0421pACOO&m=32f0ecbd84…
Forget vote:
https://antispam.belnet.be/canit/b.php?c=f&i=0421pACOO&m=32f0ecbd84…
------------------------------------------------------
END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
12 Feb
12 Feb
5:40 p.m.
Dear Philippe,
Dear Colleagues,
First let me apologies since I couldn’t attend today’s audio due to other commitments I
had
Of course I will catch-up through the minutes
As for the rest, I will be attending SPARTA EC Review on 28/02 as Thales representative.
Now regarding involvement in WP11 and due to other commitments I now have at ThereSIS I’ve
already engaged discussion with Olivier/Emmanuel and will let you know asap the person in
support and so to be added.
Best Regards,
Pascal
De : network.certification [mailto:network.certification-bounces@server.sparta.eu] De la
part de Philippe Massonet
Envoyé : mardi 11 février 2020 15:06
À : network.certification(a)internal.sparta.eu
Objet : [SPARTA - network.certification] Fwd: Re: [SPARTA - bodies.executive-board] Slides
for the review
Dear partners,
Please find attached the review presentation template. I suggest to review the template
during tomorrow's call at 11:00 CET so that task leaders can provide the contents for
their activities.
For the agenda, I suggest:
- review of the review presentation template with respect to WP11 tasks.
- access to standards mentionned in D11.1
- CyberCert workshop status
Best regards,
Philippe
-------- Message transféré --------
Sujet :
Re: [SPARTA - bodies.executive-board] Slides for the review
Date :
Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:36:33 +0000
De :
LEMESLE Augustin <augustin.lemesle@cea.fr><mailto:augustin.lemesle@cea.fr
Pour :
bodies.executive-board@internal.sparta.eu<mailto:bodies.executive-board@internal.sparta.eu>
<bodies.executive-board@internal.sparta.eu><mailto:bodies.executive-board@internal.sparta.eu
Dear WP leaders,
Please find attached the new template for the review. Only minor modification were made, I
removed KPIs and added the missing Roadmap slides.
It can be found on the SVN and also on Stackfield. I hope we can have some preliminary
slides by 14th February and final version by 21th.
Best regards,
Augustin.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : bodies.executive-board
<bodies.executive-board-bounces@server.sparta.eu><mailto:bodies.executive-board-bounces@server.sparta.eu>
De la part de LEMESLE Augustin
Envoyé : mercredi 5 février 2020 09:34
À :
bodies.executive-board@internal.sparta.eu<mailto:bodies.executive-board@internal.sparta.eu
Objet : [PROVENANCE INTERNET] Re: [SPARTA - bodies.executive-board] Slides for the
review
Dear all,
To answer some of your concerns and for clarification, we thought of the 1 person per
organisation as the PO told us the room would be a 40 person room. Since indeed it might
limit interactions and Q&A, we will try to see with the PO for bigger premises or some
alternative solution as Michael or Hervé mentioned. For that, we would need a list of all
people attending the review, I would suggest to try and compile it at WP level, and we
would discuss with the PO with this list.
On achievements slides, I did not want to fill the template with empty achievement slides
but I expect more than one slide for achievement. What I was thinking of was a quick look
at project management on which they will already have other material but still seems good
to mention and more lengthy focus on achievements (indeed with one slide it was not
obvious). I am open to suggestion on this and on the content we could put in
"Achievements" slides. What would you see in this?
On other points:
- @Michael: on the agenda, first session WP1 and WP2 (+ WP14) may be joint and we need to
discuss this but other session will stay per WP only.
- @Jan: I'd say just not to focus on the summary orally
- My bad for the Roadmap slide will be added in the final version, I'm open to
suggestion on possible content also.
- Demonstration is indeed only for programs.
Best regards,
Augustin.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Herve Debar
<herve.debar@telecom-sudparis.eu><mailto:herve.debar@telecom-sudparis.eu>
Envoyé : mardi 4 février 2020 14:49 À : LEMESLE Augustin
<augustin.lemesle@cea.fr><mailto:augustin.lemesle@cea.fr> Cc :
bodies.executive-board@internal.sparta.eu<mailto:bodies.executive-board@internal.sparta.eu
Objet : Re: [SPARTA - bodies.executive-board] Slides for the review
Dear Augustin,
I agree with many of Michael's points.
The slides seem very mechanical. On one hand, they do not easily reflect the actual
scientific production for a program. On the other hand, they seem to provide a rather
abstract projection of the governance activity, which is more "project
management", but not really governance per se.
I also share the worry about content. I am wondering about attendance of at least task
leaders for CAPE. It seems to me that the best would be to limit the number of people *in
the room* per period, e.g. for CAPE have only the 13 partners participating in the review,
and the others wait in an adjacent room. It will create some in/out confusion in the room,
but might allow for more interaction with the reviewers if needed. At the same time I can
understand doubts about the actual feasibility of my proposal.
Best regards,
Hervé
Le 04/02/2020 à 13:39, Friedewald, Michael a écrit :
><mailto:michael.friedewald@isi.fra> unhofer.de
--
Hervé Debar
<mailto:herve.debar@telecom-sudparis.eu><mailto:herve.debar@telecom-sudparis.eu
Télécom SudParis http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~debar_he/
Département Réseaux et Services de Télécommunications (RST)
Tel: +33 (0)1 60 76 45 83 GSM: +33 (0)6 71 92 52 52
PGP: 539B427D Fax: +33 (0)1 60 76 42 91
--
bodies.executive-board mailing list
bodies.executive-board@server.sparta.eu<mailto:bodies.executive-board@server.sparta.eu
http://server.sparta.eu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bodies.executive-board
--
BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
------------------------------------------------------
Teach Belnet Antispam Pro if this mail (ID 0421pACOO) is spam:
Spam:
https://antispam.belnet.be/canit/b.php?c=s&i=0421pACOO&m=32f0ecbd84…
Not spam:
https://antispam.belnet.be/canit/b.php?c=n&i=0421pACOO&m=32f0ecbd84…
Forget vote:
https://antispam.belnet.be/canit/b.php?c=f&i=0421pACOO&m=32f0ecbd84…
------------------------------------------------------
END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
Dear Agustin,
according to the last agenda that was discussed there
will be joint presentations of more than one WP (WP 1, 2, 14 / WP 8, 9 / WP 10, 11, 12).
Your slides do not seem to fit for that purpose.
Apart from that the presentation seem to be quite
formalistic: Lots of
slides on KPI, submitted deliverables, formal risks,
etc. – but only
one slide on “Achievements”. Could you please
elaborate how many
slides you expect in total and where the focus should
be. In my
experience reviewers are more interested in content …
Could you also elaborate a little bit about the
limitation of participants in the review meeting. I do understand that space is limited
for such a big consortium like SPARTA.
However, if we are going to discuss CONTENT with the
reviewers it might be necessary to have at least some people available. For instance:
Since I am not a legal scholar I can maybe give an overview of the results but when it
comes to Q&A I would be rather soon at my limits and would probably give the word to
the experts. Otherwise the impression that we give might be a bit strange. Having them
stand-by outside the room and asking them inside for the relevant work packages might not
be very convenient but a possibility.
Best
Michael
---
Dr. Michael Friedewald
Coordinator ICT Research
Competence Center Emerging Technologies
Fraunhofer-Institut für
System- und Innovationsforschung ISI Breslauer Straße
48 | 76139
Karlsruhe
fon: +49 721 6809-146 (-189, ass.) | fax: +49 721
6809-77-146
mailto:
>
michael.friedewald@isi.fraunhofer.de<mailto:michael.friedewald@isi.fraunhofer.de><mailto:michael.friedewald@isi.fra<mailto:michael.friedewald@isi.fra Neue Veröffentlichungen:
Ochs, C.; Friedewald, M.; Hess, T.; Lamla, J. (Hrsg.):
Die Zukunft der
Datenökonomie. Digitales Leben zwischen
Geschäftsmodell, Kollektivgut
und Verbraucherschutz. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 2019
(Medienkulturen
im digitalen Zeitalter).
Friedewald, M. (Hrsg.): Privatheit und
selbstbestimmtes Leben in der
Digitalen Welt: Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven auf
aktuelle
Herausforderungen des Datenschutzes. Wiesbaden:
Springer Vieweg. 2018
M. Friedewald et al. (eds.): Privacy, Security and
Surveillance:
Citizens’ Perspectives. London/New York: Routledge.
2017 (Open Access)
erspectives/Friedewald-Burgess-Cas-Bellanova-Peissl/p/book/97811386492
48
Am 03.02.20, 16:06 schrieb
"bodies.executive-board im Auftrag von LEMESLE Augustin"
<bodies.executive-board-bounces@server.sparta.eu<mailto:bodies.executive-board-bounces@server.sparta.eu><mailto:bodies.executive-board-bounces@server.sparta.eu><mailto:bodies.executive-board-bounces@server.sparta.eu>
im Auftrag von
augustin.lemesle@cea.fr<mailto:augustin.lemesle@cea.fr><mailto:augustin.lemesle@cea.fr><mailto:augustin.lemesle@cea.fr>>:
Dear WP leaders,
For the review, on 28th you can find attached a
proposition for templates for the WP presentation. As a quick timeline before the review:
· Feedback w.r.t. proposed templates until
7/02
· Preliminary version of the slides sent to
coordination until 14/02
· Final slide version until 21/02
For reminder, we expect 1 person per organisation
maximum at the review.
Best regards,
Augustin.
13 Feb
13 Feb
8:31 a.m.
Hi Pascal,
Thank you for informing us. The minutes will be available on the svn
this afternoon. We will need input from partners for "current status and
achievements" and "roadmap" for the review prersentation. It will be
collected by the task leaders.
As soon as there are other THALES people involved in WP11 they can
request to be added to the WP11 mailing list and I will add them to the
monthly audio conference invitations.
Best regards,
Philippe
Le 12/02/20 à 18:40, BISSON Pascal a écrit :
Dear Philippe,
Dear Colleagues,
First let me apologies since I couldn’t attend today’s audio due to
other commitments I had
Of course I will catch-up through the minutes
As for the rest, I will be attending SPARTA EC Review on 28/02 as
Thales representative.
Now regarding involvement in WP11 and due to other commitments I now
have at ThereSIS I’ve already engaged discussion with Olivier/Emmanuel
and will let you know asap the person in support and so to be added.
Best Regards,
Pascal
*De :*network.certification
[mailto:network.certification-bounces@server.sparta.eu] *De la part
de* Philippe Massonet
*Envoyé :* mardi 11 février 2020 15:06
*À :* network.certification(a)internal.sparta.eu
*Objet :* [SPARTA - network.certification] Fwd: Re: [SPARTA -
bodies.executive-board] Slides for the review
Dear partners,
Please find attached the review presentation template. I suggest to
review the template during tomorrow's call at 11:00 CET so that task
leaders can provide the contents for their activities.
For the agenda, I suggest:
- review of the review presentation template with respect to WP11 tasks.
- access to standards mentionned in D11.1
- CyberCert workshop status
Best regards,
Philippe
-------- Message transféré --------
*Sujet : *
Re: [SPARTA - bodies.executive-board] Slides for the review
*Date : *
Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:36:33 +0000
*De : *
LEMESLE Augustin <augustin.lemesle(a)cea.fr>
<mailto:augustin.lemesle@cea.fr>
*Pour : *
bodies.executive-board(a)internal.sparta.eu
<mailto:bodies.executive-board@internal.sparta.eu>
<bodies.executive-board(a)internal.sparta.eu>
<mailto:bodies.executive-board@internal.sparta.eu>
Dear WP leaders,
Please find attached the new template for the review. Only minor modification were made,
I removed KPIs and added the missing Roadmap slides.
It can be found on the SVN and also on Stackfield. I hope we can have some preliminary
slides by 14th February and final version by 21th.
Best regards,
Augustin.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : bodies.executive-board<bodies.executive-board-bounces(a)server.sparta.eu>
<mailto:bodies.executive-board-bounces@server.sparta.eu> De la part de LEMESLE
Augustin
Envoyé : mercredi 5 février 2020 09:34
À :bodies.executive-board@internal.sparta.eu
<mailto:bodies.executive-board@internal.sparta.eu>
Objet : [PROVENANCE INTERNET] Re: [SPARTA - bodies.executive-board] Slides for the
review
Dear all,
To answer some of your concerns and for clarification, we thought of the 1 person per
organisation as the PO told us the room would be a 40 person room. Since indeed it might
limit interactions and Q&A, we will try to see with the PO for bigger premises or some
alternative solution as Michael or Hervé mentioned. For that, we would need a list of all
people attending the review, I would suggest to try and compile it at WP level, and we
would discuss with the PO with this list.
On achievements slides, I did not want to fill the template with empty achievement slides
but I expect more than one slide for achievement. What I was thinking of was a quick look
at project management on which they will already have other material but still seems good
to mention and more lengthy focus on achievements (indeed with one slide it was not
obvious). I am open to suggestion on this and on the content we could put in
"Achievements" slides. What would you see in this?
On other points:
- @Michael: on the agenda, first session WP1 and WP2 (+ WP14) may be joint and we need to
discuss this but other session will stay per WP only.
- @Jan: I'd say just not to focus on the summary orally
- My bad for the Roadmap slide will be added in the final version, I'm open to
suggestion on possible content also.
- Demonstration is indeed only for programs.
Best regards,
Augustin.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Herve Debar<herve.debar(a)telecom-sudparis.eu>
<mailto:herve.debar@telecom-sudparis.eu> Envoyé : mardi 4 février 2020 14:49 À :
LEMESLE Augustin<augustin.lemesle(a)cea.fr> <mailto:augustin.lemesle@cea.fr> Cc
:bodies.executive-board@internal.sparta.eu
<mailto:bodies.executive-board@internal.sparta.eu>
Objet : Re: [SPARTA - bodies.executive-board] Slides for the review
Dear Augustin,
I agree with many of Michael's points.
The slides seem very mechanical. On one hand, they do not easily reflect the actual
scientific production for a program. On the other hand, they seem to provide a rather
abstract projection of the governance activity, which is more "project
management", but not really governance per se.
I also share the worry about content. I am wondering about attendance of at least task
leaders for CAPE. It seems to me that the best would be to limit the number of people *in
the room* per period, e.g. for CAPE have only the 13 partners participating in the review,
and the others wait in an adjacent room. It will create some in/out confusion in the room,
but might allow for more interaction with the reviewers if needed. At the same time I can
understand doubts about the actual feasibility of my proposal.
Best regards,
Hervé
Le 04/02/2020 à 13:39, Friedewald, Michael a écrit :
--
*Philippe Massonet*
/Scientific Coordinator/
CETIC
Avenue Jean Mermoz, 28
B-6041 Charleroi
Mobile: +32 472 56 98 31
e-mail: philippe.massonet(a)cetic.be <mailto:philippe.massonet@cetic.be>
https://www.cetic.be/
/
/
Dear Agustin,
according to the last agenda that was discussed there will be joint presentations of more
than one WP (WP 1, 2, 14 / WP 8, 9 / WP 10, 11, 12). Your slides do not seem to fit for
that purpose.
Apart from that the presentation seem to be quite formalistic: Lots of
slides on KPI, submitted deliverables, formal risks, etc. – but only
one slide on “Achievements”. Could you please elaborate how many
slides you expect in total and where the focus should be. In my
experience reviewers are more interested in content …
Could you also elaborate a little bit about the limitation of participants in the review
meeting. I do understand that space is limited for such a big consortium like SPARTA.
However, if we are going to discuss CONTENT with the reviewers it might be necessary to
have at least some people available. For instance: Since I am not a legal scholar I can
maybe give an overview of the results but when it comes to Q&A I would be rather soon
at my limits and would probably give the word to the experts. Otherwise the impression
that we give might be a bit strange. Having them stand-by outside the room and asking them
inside for the relevant work packages might not be very convenient but a possibility.
Best
Michael
---
Dr. Michael Friedewald
Coordinator ICT Research
Competence Center Emerging Technologies Fraunhofer-Institut für
System- und Innovationsforschung ISI Breslauer Straße 48 | 76139
Karlsruhe
fon: +49 721 6809-146 (-189, ass.) | fax: +49 721 6809-77-146
mailto:
michael.friedewald(a)isi.fraunhofer.de
<mailto:michael.friedewald@isi.fraunhofer.de><mailto:michael.friedewald@isi.fra
<mailto:michael.friedewald@isi.fra>
<mailto:michael.friedewald@isi.fra>
unhofer.de>
https://www.isi.fraunhofer.de
https://www.forum-privatheit.de
https://www.dsfa.eu
https://works.bepress.com/michael_friedewald/
Neue Veröffentlichungen:
Ochs, C.; Friedewald, M.; Hess, T.; Lamla, J. (Hrsg.): Die Zukunft der
Datenökonomie. Digitales Leben zwischen Geschäftsmodell, Kollektivgut
und Verbraucherschutz. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 2019 (Medienkulturen
im digitalen Zeitalter).
https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783658275105
Friedewald, M. (Hrsg.): Privatheit und selbstbestimmtes Leben in der
Digitalen Welt: Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven auf aktuelle
Herausforderungen des Datenschutzes. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg. 2018
https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783658213831
M. Friedewald et al. (eds.): Privacy, Security and Surveillance:
Citizens’ Perspectives. London/New York: Routledge. 2017 (Open Access)
https://www.routledge.com/Surveillance-Privacy-and-Security-Citizens-P
erspectives/Friedewald-Burgess-Cas-Bellanova-Peissl/p/book/97811386492
48
Am 03.02.20, 16:06 schrieb "bodies.executive-board im Auftrag von LEMESLE
Augustin" <bodies.executive-board-bounces(a)server.sparta.eu
<mailto:bodies.executive-board-bounces@server.sparta.eu><mailto:bodies.executive-board-bounces@server.sparta.eu>
<mailto:bodies.executive-board-bounces@server.sparta.eu> im Auftrag
vonaugustin.lemesle(a)cea.fr
<mailto:augustin.lemesle@cea.fr><mailto:augustin.lemesle@cea.fr>
<mailto:augustin.lemesle@cea.fr>>:
Dear WP leaders,
For the review, on 28th you can find attached a proposition for templates for the WP
presentation. As a quick timeline before the review:
· Feedback w.r.t. proposed templates until 7/02
· Preliminary version of the slides sent to coordination until 14/02
· Final slide version until 21/02
For reminder, we expect 1 person per organisation maximum at the review.
Best regards,
Augustin.
--
Hervé Debar<mailto:herve.debar@telecom-sudparis.eu>
<mailto:herve.debar@telecom-sudparis.eu>
Télécom SudParishttp://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~debar_he/
<http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/%7Edebar_he/>
Département Réseaux et Services de Télécommunications (RST)
Tel: +33 (0)1 60 76 45 83 GSM: +33 (0)6 71 92 52 52
PGP: 539B427D Fax: +33 (0)1 60 76 42 91
--
bodies.executive-board mailing list
bodies.executive-board(a)server.sparta.eu
<mailto:bodies.executive-board@server.sparta.eu>
http://server.sparta.eu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bodies.executive-board
--
BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
------------------------------------------------------
Teach Belnet Antispam Pro if this mail (ID 0421pACOO) is spam:
Spam:
Not spam:
Forget vote:
------------------------------------------------------
END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Spam
<https://antispam.belnet.be/canit/b.php?c=s&i=0421REjT0&m=38556362249e&rlm=cetic&t=20200212>
Not spam
<https://antispam.belnet.be/canit/b.php?c=n&i=0421REjT0&m=38556362249e&rlm=cetic&t=20200212>
Forget previous vote
<https://antispam.belnet.be/canit/b.php?c=f&i=0421REjT0&m=38556362249e&rlm=cetic&t=20200212>
2066
days inactive
2068
days old
network.certification@internal.sparta.eu
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
BISSON Pascal -
Philippe Massonet