[SPARTA - network.certification] Presence of WP11 participants at the review

Dear WP11 partners, As you know the SPARTA review will take place on Friday 28/02. The current meeting room for the review has 40 places maximum. This is why CEA is suggesting to limit representation at 1 person per partner. CEA has asked WP leaders to compile a list of participants for each WP: "I would suggest to try and compile it at WP level, and we would discuss with the PO with this list". Could you indicate you presence at the review at https://cryptpad.fr/poll/#/2/poll/edit/t4Q1FpWa2rnjCOfr3FMy8N7A/ ? Thank you, Philippe -------- Message transféré -------- Sujet : Re: [SPARTA - bodies.executive-board] Slides for the review Date : Wed, 5 Feb 2020 08:34:20 +0000 De : LEMESLE Augustin &lt;augustin.lemesle(a)cea.fr&gt; Pour : bodies.executive-board(a)internal.sparta.eu &lt;bodies.executive-board(a)internal.sparta.eu&gt; Dear all, To answer some of your concerns and for clarification, we thought of the 1 person per organisation as the PO told us the room would be a 40 person room. Since indeed it might limit interactions and Q&A, we will try to see with the PO for bigger premises or some alternative solution as Michael or Hervé mentioned. For that, we would need a list of all people attending the review, I would suggest to try and compile it at WP level, and we would discuss with the PO with this list. On achievements slides, I did not want to fill the template with empty achievement slides but I expect more than one slide for achievement. What I was thinking of was a quick look at project management on which they will already have other material but still seems good to mention and more lengthy focus on achievements (indeed with one slide it was not obvious). I am open to suggestion on this and on the content we could put in "Achievements" slides. What would you see in this? On other points: - @Michael: on the agenda, first session WP1 and WP2 (+ WP14) may be joint and we need to discuss this but other session will stay per WP only. - @Jan: I'd say just not to focus on the summary orally - My bad for the Roadmap slide will be added in the final version, I'm open to suggestion on possible content also. - Demonstration is indeed only for programs. Best regards, Augustin. -----Message d'origine----- De : Herve Debar &lt;herve.debar(a)telecom-sudparis.eu&gt; Envoyé : mardi 4 février 2020 14:49 À : LEMESLE Augustin &lt;augustin.lemesle(a)cea.fr&gt; Cc : bodies.executive-board(a)internal.sparta.eu Objet : Re: [SPARTA - bodies.executive-board] Slides for the review Dear Augustin, I agree with many of Michael's points. The slides seem very mechanical. On one hand, they do not easily reflect the actual scientific production for a program. On the other hand, they seem to provide a rather abstract projection of the governance activity, which is more "project management", but not really governance per se. I also share the worry about content. I am wondering about attendance of at least task leaders for CAPE. It seems to me that the best would be to limit the number of people *in the room* per period, e.g. for CAPE have only the 13 partners participating in the review, and the others wait in an adjacent room. It will create some in/out confusion in the room, but might allow for more interaction with the reviewers if needed. At the same time I can understand doubts about the actual feasibility of my proposal. Best regards, Hervé Le 04/02/2020 à 13:39, Friedewald, Michael a écrit : -- Hervé Debar <mailto:herve.debar@telecom-sudparis.eu> Télécom SudParis http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~debar_he/ Département Réseaux et Services de Télécommunications (RST) Tel: +33 (0)1 60 76 45 83 GSM: +33 (0)6 71 92 52 52 PGP: 539B427D Fax: +33 (0)1 60 76 42 91 -- bodies.executive-board mailing list bodies.executive-board(a)server.sparta.eu http://server.sparta.eu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bodies.executive-board -- BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS ------------------------------------------------------ Teach Belnet Antispam Pro if this mail (ID 041WUynKD) is spam: Spam: https://antispam.belnet.be/canit/b.php?c=s&i=041WUynKD&m=6b7ff82141… Not spam: https://antispam.belnet.be/canit/b.php?c=n&i=041WUynKD&m=6b7ff82141… Forget vote: https://antispam.belnet.be/canit/b.php?c=f&i=041WUynKD&m=6b7ff82141… ------------------------------------------------------ END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS