Dear partners,
Please find attached the review presentation template. I suggest to
review the template during tomorrow's call at 11:00 CET so that task
leaders can provide the contents for their activities.
For the agenda, I suggest:
- review of the review presentation template with respect to WP11 tasks.
- access to standards mentionned in D11.1
- CyberCert workshop status
Best regards,
Philippe
-------- Message transféré --------
Sujet : Re: [SPARTA - bodies.executive-board] Slides for the review
Date : Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:36:33 +0000
De : LEMESLE Augustin <augustin.lemesle(a)cea.fr>
Pour : bodies.executive-board(a)internal.sparta.eu
<bodies.executive-board(a)internal.sparta.eu>
Dear WP leaders,
Please find attached the new template for the review. Only minor modification were made, I removed KPIs and added the missing Roadmap slides.
It can be found on the SVN and also on Stackfield. I hope we can have some preliminary slides by 14th February and final version by 21th.
Best regards,
Augustin.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : bodies.executive-board <bodies.executive-board-bounces(a)server.sparta.eu> De la part de LEMESLE Augustin
Envoyé : mercredi 5 février 2020 09:34
À : bodies.executive-board(a)internal.sparta.eu
Objet : [PROVENANCE INTERNET] Re: [SPARTA - bodies.executive-board] Slides for the review
Dear all,
To answer some of your concerns and for clarification, we thought of the 1 person per organisation as the PO told us the room would be a 40 person room. Since indeed it might limit interactions and Q&A, we will try to see with the PO for bigger premises or some alternative solution as Michael or Hervé mentioned. For that, we would need a list of all people attending the review, I would suggest to try and compile it at WP level, and we would discuss with the PO with this list.
On achievements slides, I did not want to fill the template with empty achievement slides but I expect more than one slide for achievement. What I was thinking of was a quick look at project management on which they will already have other material but still seems good to mention and more lengthy focus on achievements (indeed with one slide it was not obvious). I am open to suggestion on this and on the content we could put in "Achievements" slides. What would you see in this?
On other points:
- @Michael: on the agenda, first session WP1 and WP2 (+ WP14) may be joint and we need to discuss this but other session will stay per WP only.
- @Jan: I'd say just not to focus on the summary orally
- My bad for the Roadmap slide will be added in the final version, I'm open to suggestion on possible content also.
- Demonstration is indeed only for programs.
Best regards,
Augustin.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Herve Debar <herve.debar(a)telecom-sudparis.eu> Envoyé : mardi 4 février 2020 14:49 À : LEMESLE Augustin <augustin.lemesle(a)cea.fr> Cc : bodies.executive-board(a)internal.sparta.eu
Objet : Re: [SPARTA - bodies.executive-board] Slides for the review
Dear Augustin,
I agree with many of Michael's points.
The slides seem very mechanical. On one hand, they do not easily reflect the actual scientific production for a program. On the other hand, they seem to provide a rather abstract projection of the governance activity, which is more "project management", but not really governance per se.
I also share the worry about content. I am wondering about attendance of at least task leaders for CAPE. It seems to me that the best would be to limit the number of people *in the room* per period, e.g. for CAPE have only the 13 partners participating in the review, and the others wait in an adjacent room. It will create some in/out confusion in the room, but might allow for more interaction with the reviewers if needed. At the same time I can understand doubts about the actual feasibility of my proposal.
Best regards,
Hervé
Le 04/02/2020 à 13:39, Friedewald, Michael a écrit :
> Dear Agustin,
>
> according to the last agenda that was discussed there will be joint presentations of more than one WP (WP 1, 2, 14 / WP 8, 9 / WP 10, 11, 12). Your slides do not seem to fit for that purpose.
>
> Apart from that the presentation seem to be quite formalistic: Lots of
> slides on KPI, submitted deliverables, formal risks, etc. – but only
> one slide on “Achievements”. Could you please elaborate how many
> slides you expect in total and where the focus should be. In my
> experience reviewers are more interested in content …
>
> Could you also elaborate a little bit about the limitation of participants in the review meeting. I do understand that space is limited for such a big consortium like SPARTA.
> However, if we are going to discuss CONTENT with the reviewers it might be necessary to have at least some people available. For instance: Since I am not a legal scholar I can maybe give an overview of the results but when it comes to Q&A I would be rather soon at my limits and would probably give the word to the experts. Otherwise the impression that we give might be a bit strange. Having them stand-by outside the room and asking them inside for the relevant work packages might not be very convenient but a possibility.
>
> Best
> Michael
>
> ---
> Dr. Michael Friedewald
>
> Coordinator ICT Research
> Competence Center Emerging Technologies Fraunhofer-Institut für
> System- und Innovationsforschung ISI Breslauer Straße 48 | 76139
> Karlsruhe
> fon: +49 721 6809-146 (-189, ass.) | fax: +49 721 6809-77-146
> mailto:
> michael.friedewald(a)isi.fraunhofer.de<mailto:michael.friedewald@isi.fra
> unhofer.de>
> https://www.isi.fraunhofer.de
> https://www.forum-privatheit.de
> https://www.dsfa.eu
> https://works.bepress.com/michael_friedewald/
>
>
> Neue Veröffentlichungen:
>
> Ochs, C.; Friedewald, M.; Hess, T.; Lamla, J. (Hrsg.): Die Zukunft der
> Datenökonomie. Digitales Leben zwischen Geschäftsmodell, Kollektivgut
> und Verbraucherschutz. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 2019 (Medienkulturen
> im digitalen Zeitalter).
> https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783658275105
>
> Friedewald, M. (Hrsg.): Privatheit und selbstbestimmtes Leben in der
> Digitalen Welt: Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven auf aktuelle
> Herausforderungen des Datenschutzes. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg. 2018
> https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783658213831
>
> M. Friedewald et al. (eds.): Privacy, Security and Surveillance:
> Citizens’ Perspectives. London/New York: Routledge. 2017 (Open Access)
> https://www.routledge.com/Surveillance-Privacy-and-Security-Citizens-P
> erspectives/Friedewald-Burgess-Cas-Bellanova-Peissl/p/book/97811386492
> 48
>
> Am 03.02.20, 16:06 schrieb "bodies.executive-board im Auftrag von LEMESLE Augustin" <bodies.executive-board-bounces(a)server.sparta.eu<mailto:bodies.executive-board-bounces@server.sparta.eu> im Auftrag von augustin.lemesle(a)cea.fr<mailto:augustin.lemesle@cea.fr>>:
>
> Dear WP leaders,
>
> For the review, on 28th you can find attached a proposition for templates for the WP presentation. As a quick timeline before the review:
>
> · Feedback w.r.t. proposed templates until 7/02
>
> · Preliminary version of the slides sent to coordination until 14/02
>
> · Final slide version until 21/02
>
> For reminder, we expect 1 person per organisation maximum at the review.
>
> Best regards,
> Augustin.
>
--
Hervé Debar <mailto:herve.debar@telecom-sudparis.eu>
Télécom SudParis http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~debar_he/
Département Réseaux et Services de Télécommunications (RST)
Tel: +33 (0)1 60 76 45 83 GSM: +33 (0)6 71 92 52 52
PGP: 539B427D Fax: +33 (0)1 60 76 42 91
--
bodies.executive-board mailing list
bodies.executive-board(a)server.sparta.eu
http://server.sparta.eu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bodies.executive-board
--
BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
------------------------------------------------------
Teach Belnet Antispam Pro if this mail (ID 0421pACOO) is spam:
Spam: https://antispam.belnet.be/canit/b.php?c=s&i=0421pACOO&m=32f0ecbd84ab&rlm=c…
Not spam: https://antispam.belnet.be/canit/b.php?c=n&i=0421pACOO&m=32f0ecbd84ab&rlm=c…
Forget vote: https://antispam.belnet.be/canit/b.php?c=f&i=0421pACOO&m=32f0ecbd84ab&rlm=c…
------------------------------------------------------
END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
Dear WP11 partners,
As you know the SPARTA review will take place on Friday 28/02. The
current meeting room for the review has 40 places maximum. This is why
CEA is suggesting to limit representation at 1 person per partner. CEA
has asked WP leaders to compile a list of participants for each WP: "I
would suggest to try and compile it at WP level, and we would discuss
with the PO with this list".
Could you indicate you presence at the review at
https://cryptpad.fr/poll/#/2/poll/edit/t4Q1FpWa2rnjCOfr3FMy8N7A/ ?
Thank you,
Philippe
-------- Message transféré --------
Sujet : Re: [SPARTA - bodies.executive-board] Slides for the review
Date : Wed, 5 Feb 2020 08:34:20 +0000
De : LEMESLE Augustin <augustin.lemesle(a)cea.fr>
Pour : bodies.executive-board(a)internal.sparta.eu
<bodies.executive-board(a)internal.sparta.eu>
Dear all,
To answer some of your concerns and for clarification, we thought of the 1 person per organisation as the PO told us the room would be a 40 person room. Since indeed it might limit interactions and Q&A, we will try to see with the PO for bigger premises or some alternative solution as Michael or Hervé mentioned. For that, we would need a list of all people attending the review, I would suggest to try and compile it at WP level, and we would discuss with the PO with this list.
On achievements slides, I did not want to fill the template with empty achievement slides but I expect more than one slide for achievement. What I was thinking of was a quick look at project management on which they will already have other material but still seems good to mention and more lengthy focus on achievements (indeed with one slide it was not obvious). I am open to suggestion on this and on the content we could put in "Achievements" slides. What would you see in this?
On other points:
- @Michael: on the agenda, first session WP1 and WP2 (+ WP14) may be joint and we need to discuss this but other session will stay per WP only.
- @Jan: I'd say just not to focus on the summary orally
- My bad for the Roadmap slide will be added in the final version, I'm open to suggestion on possible content also.
- Demonstration is indeed only for programs.
Best regards,
Augustin.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Herve Debar <herve.debar(a)telecom-sudparis.eu>
Envoyé : mardi 4 février 2020 14:49
À : LEMESLE Augustin <augustin.lemesle(a)cea.fr>
Cc : bodies.executive-board(a)internal.sparta.eu
Objet : Re: [SPARTA - bodies.executive-board] Slides for the review
Dear Augustin,
I agree with many of Michael's points.
The slides seem very mechanical. On one hand, they do not easily reflect the actual scientific production for a program. On the other hand, they seem to provide a rather abstract projection of the governance activity, which is more "project management", but not really governance per se.
I also share the worry about content. I am wondering about attendance of at least task leaders for CAPE. It seems to me that the best would be to limit the number of people *in the room* per period, e.g. for CAPE have only the 13 partners participating in the review, and the others wait in an adjacent room. It will create some in/out confusion in the room, but might allow for more interaction with the reviewers if needed. At the same time I can understand doubts about the actual feasibility of my proposal.
Best regards,
Hervé
Le 04/02/2020 à 13:39, Friedewald, Michael a écrit :
> Dear Agustin,
>
> according to the last agenda that was discussed there will be joint presentations of more than one WP (WP 1, 2, 14 / WP 8, 9 / WP 10, 11, 12). Your slides do not seem to fit for that purpose.
>
> Apart from that the presentation seem to be quite formalistic: Lots of
> slides on KPI, submitted deliverables, formal risks, etc. – but only
> one slide on “Achievements”. Could you please elaborate how many
> slides you expect in total and where the focus should be. In my
> experience reviewers are more interested in content …
>
> Could you also elaborate a little bit about the limitation of participants in the review meeting. I do understand that space is limited for such a big consortium like SPARTA.
> However, if we are going to discuss CONTENT with the reviewers it might be necessary to have at least some people available. For instance: Since I am not a legal scholar I can maybe give an overview of the results but when it comes to Q&A I would be rather soon at my limits and would probably give the word to the experts. Otherwise the impression that we give might be a bit strange. Having them stand-by outside the room and asking them inside for the relevant work packages might not be very convenient but a possibility.
>
> Best
> Michael
>
> ---
> Dr. Michael Friedewald
>
> Coordinator ICT Research
> Competence Center Emerging Technologies Fraunhofer-Institut für
> System- und Innovationsforschung ISI Breslauer Straße 48 | 76139
> Karlsruhe
> fon: +49 721 6809-146 (-189, ass.) | fax: +49 721 6809-77-146
> mailto:
> michael.friedewald(a)isi.fraunhofer.de<mailto:michael.friedewald@isi.fra
> unhofer.de>
> https://www.isi.fraunhofer.de
> https://www.forum-privatheit.de
> https://www.dsfa.eu
> https://works.bepress.com/michael_friedewald/
>
>
> Neue Veröffentlichungen:
>
> Ochs, C.; Friedewald, M.; Hess, T.; Lamla, J. (Hrsg.): Die Zukunft der
> Datenökonomie. Digitales Leben zwischen Geschäftsmodell, Kollektivgut
> und Verbraucherschutz. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 2019 (Medienkulturen
> im digitalen Zeitalter).
> https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783658275105
>
> Friedewald, M. (Hrsg.): Privatheit und selbstbestimmtes Leben in der
> Digitalen Welt: Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven auf aktuelle
> Herausforderungen des Datenschutzes. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg. 2018
> https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783658213831
>
> M. Friedewald et al. (eds.): Privacy, Security and Surveillance:
> Citizens’ Perspectives. London/New York: Routledge. 2017 (Open Access)
> https://www.routledge.com/Surveillance-Privacy-and-Security-Citizens-P
> erspectives/Friedewald-Burgess-Cas-Bellanova-Peissl/p/book/97811386492
> 48
>
> Am 03.02.20, 16:06 schrieb "bodies.executive-board im Auftrag von LEMESLE Augustin" <bodies.executive-board-bounces(a)server.sparta.eu<mailto:bodies.executive-board-bounces@server.sparta.eu> im Auftrag von augustin.lemesle(a)cea.fr<mailto:augustin.lemesle@cea.fr>>:
>
> Dear WP leaders,
>
> For the review, on 28th you can find attached a proposition for templates for the WP presentation. As a quick timeline before the review:
>
> · Feedback w.r.t. proposed templates until 7/02
>
> · Preliminary version of the slides sent to coordination until 14/02
>
> · Final slide version until 21/02
>
> For reminder, we expect 1 person per organisation maximum at the review.
>
> Best regards,
> Augustin.
>
--
Hervé Debar <mailto:herve.debar@telecom-sudparis.eu>
Télécom SudParis http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~debar_he/
Département Réseaux et Services de Télécommunications (RST)
Tel: +33 (0)1 60 76 45 83 GSM: +33 (0)6 71 92 52 52
PGP: 539B427D Fax: +33 (0)1 60 76 42 91
--
bodies.executive-board mailing list
bodies.executive-board(a)server.sparta.eu
http://server.sparta.eu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bodies.executive-board
--
BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
------------------------------------------------------
Teach Belnet Antispam Pro if this mail (ID 041WUynKD) is spam:
Spam: https://antispam.belnet.be/canit/b.php?c=s&i=041WUynKD&m=6b7ff82141f4&rlm=c…
Not spam: https://antispam.belnet.be/canit/b.php?c=n&i=041WUynKD&m=6b7ff82141f4&rlm=c…
Forget vote: https://antispam.belnet.be/canit/b.php?c=f&i=041WUynKD&m=6b7ff82141f4&rlm=c…
------------------------------------------------------
END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
Dear WP11 partners,
The minutes of today's audio conference are available in
https://sparta.technikon.com/03-WPs/WP11-Certification-organization-and-sup….
Best regards,
Philippe
--
*Philippe Massonet*
/Scientific Coordinator/
CETIC
Avenue Jean Mermoz, 28
B-6041 Charleroi
Mobile: +32 472 56 98 31
e-mail: philippe.massonet(a)cetic.be <mailto:philippe.massonet@cetic.be>
https://www.cetic.be/
/
/
Dear partners,
Audio conference link (the same link as before):
https://zoom.us/j/916477656
<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://zoom.us/j/916477656&sa=D&ust=157881830…>
The agenda for this morning's audio conference is the following:
- T11.1: review of status of D11.1, CyberCert workshop proposal accepted
and next steps (CETIC)
- T11.2: review of current status, preparation of input for SPARTA
review (CEA)
- T11.3: review of current status, preparation of input for SPARTA
review (LEO)
- T11.4: review of current status, preparation of input for SPARTA
review (SAP)
Best regards,
Philippe
--
*Philippe Massonet*
/Scientific Coordinator/
CETIC
Avenue Jean Mermoz, 28
B-6041 Charleroi
Mobile: +32 472 56 98 31
e-mail: philippe.massonet(a)cetic.be <mailto:philippe.massonet@cetic.be>
https://www.cetic.be/
/
/
Dear WP11 partners,
We should receive the feedback for D11.1 from the internal reviewers on January 6th.
we can discuss the reviewers feedback in the telco (08/01) and be ready to submit the deliverable on the 15th. Please make sure you put some time aside in that period to take the reviewers feedback into account.
Do not hesitate to let me know if you have any issue or question
Best regards,
--
Jeremy GrandclaudonSenior R&D EngineerSoftware and System EngineeringCentre of Excellence in Information
and Communication Technologies (CETIC)Aeropole
Avenue Jean Mermoz 28
6041 Charleroi (Belgium)Mobile : +32 473 49 11 70www.cetic.be
Cet événement a été modifié.
Titre : SPARTA WP11 audio connference
ELSA + FAQAudio conference link: https://zoom.us/j/916477656Philippe
Massonet vous invite à une réunion Zoom planifiée.Sujet : WP11 audio
conference - monthlyTéléchargez et importez les fichiers iCalendar (.ics)
suivants dans votre système de calendrier.Mensuellement :
https://zoom.us/meeting/tJUrc-6vqD4sjWhM3iQ7x6NjHyqtO-abnw/ics?icsToken=f92…
à la réunion Zoomhttps://zoom.us/j/916477656Une seule touche sur l’appareil
mobile+3222909360,,916477656# Belgique+3225884188,,916477656#
BelgiqueComposez un numéro en fonction de votre
emplacement +32 2 290 9360
Belgique +32 2 588 4188
Belgique +33 1 7037 9729
France +33 7 5678 4048
France +39 020 066 7245
Italie +39 069 480 6488
ItalieID de réunion : 916 477 656Trouvez votre numéro local :
https://zoom.us/u/aUWcppq1v (modifié)
Date : mer. 8 janv. 2020 11:00 – 12:00 Heure d’Europe centrale - Bruxelles
Agenda : network.certification(a)internal.sparta.eu
Participants :
* Philippe Massonet- organisateur
* paolo.prinetto(a)polito.it
* alessandro.armando(a)unige.it
* jeremy.grandclaudon(a)cetic.be
* network.certification(a)internal.sparta.eu
* nicolo.maunero(a)consorzio-cini.it
Détails de l'événement :
https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=NGc1aTZpcmNnNzZocG1vb…
Invitation de Google Agenda : https://www.google.com/calendar/
Vous recevez ce message à l'adresse
network.certification(a)internal.sparta.eu, car vous participez à cet
événement.
Refusez cet événement pour ne plus recevoir de notifications le concernant.
Vous avez également la possibilité de créer un compte Google à l'adresse
https://www.google.com/calendar/ et de définir vous-même les paramètres de
notification pour l'intégralité de votre agenda.
En transférant cette invitation, vous risquez d'autoriser tous les
destinataires à envoyer une réponse à l'organisateur et à être ajoutés à la
liste des invités, à inviter d'autres personnes indépendamment de l'état de
l'invitation qu'ils ont reçue, ou à modifier votre réponse à l'invitation.
Pour plus d'informations, consultez la page
https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding
Dear partners,
I have to cancel the WP11 audio conference tomorrow at 11:00 CET. I have
a conflicting meeting and have to attend the EB call that overlaps our
meeting. I would like to inform you that D11.1 is progressing well and
that it will be submitted on time. Also the CybeCert workshop proposal
has been accepted. I am now negotiating to see if it can be schedued as
a pre-conference workshop rather than a post-conference workshop. Could
task leaders send me a few lines on progress within their task for the
monthly EB report?
Thank you,
Philippe
--
*Philippe Massonet*
/Scientific Coordinator/
CETIC
Avenue Jean Mermoz, 28
B-6041 Charleroi
Mobile: +32 472 56 98 31
e-mail: philippe.massonet(a)cetic.be <mailto:philippe.massonet@cetic.be>
https://www.cetic.be/
/
/
Cet événement a été annulé avec ce message :
"Dear partners,
I have to cancel the WP11 audio conference tomorrow at 11:00 CET. I have a
conflicting meeting and have to attend the EB call that overlaps our
meeting. I would like to inform you that D11.1 is progressing well and that
it will be submitted on time. Also the CybeCert workshop proposal has been
accepted. I am now negotiating to see if it can be schedued as a
pre-conference workshop rather than a post-conference workshop. Could task
leaders send me a few lines on progress within their task for the monthly
EB report?
Thank you,
Philippe"
Titre : SPARTA WP11 audio connference
Audio conference link: https://zoom.us/j/916477656
Philippe Massonet vous invite à une réunion Zoom planifiée.
Sujet : WP11 audio conference - monthly
Téléchargez et importez les fichiers iCalendar (.ics) suivants dans votre
système de calendrier.
Mensuellement :
https://zoom.us/meeting/tJUrc-6vqD4sjWhM3iQ7x6NjHyqtO-abnw/ics?icsToken=f92…
Participer à la réunion Zoom
https://zoom.us/j/916477656
Une seule touche sur l’appareil mobile
+3222909360,,916477656# Belgique
+3225884188,,916477656# Belgique
Composez un numéro en fonction de votre emplacement
+32 2 290 9360 Belgique
+32 2 588 4188 Belgique
+33 1 7037 9729 France
+33 7 5678 4048 France
+39 020 066 7245 Italie
+39 069 480 6488 Italie
ID de réunion : 916 477 656
Trouvez votre numéro local : https://zoom.us/u/aUWcppq1v
Date : mer. 11 déc. 2019 11:00 – 12:00 Heure d’Europe centrale - Bruxelles
Agenda : network.certification(a)internal.sparta.eu
Participants :
* Philippe Massonet- organisateur
* jeremy.grandclaudon(a)cetic.be
* nicolo.maunero(a)consorzio-cini.it
* network.certification(a)internal.sparta.eu
* paolo.prinetto(a)polito.it
* alessandro.armando(a)unige.it
Invitation de Google Agenda : https://www.google.com/calendar/
Vous recevez ce message à l'adresse
network.certification(a)internal.sparta.eu, car vous participez à cet
événement.
Refusez cet événement pour ne plus recevoir de notifications le concernant.
Vous avez également la possibilité de créer un compte Google à l'adresse
https://www.google.com/calendar/ et de définir vous-même les paramètres de
notification pour l'intégralité de votre agenda.
En transférant cette invitation, vous risquez d'autoriser tous les
destinataires à envoyer une réponse à l'organisateur et à être ajoutés à la
liste des invités, à inviter d'autres personnes indépendamment de l'état de
l'invitation qu'ils ont reçue, ou à modifier votre réponse à l'invitation.
Pour plus d'informations, consultez la page
https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding